Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD DIN

The Convention of Martyrdom Order 1984 law examines evidence on facts related to the evidence from the Supreme Court, inheriting evidence (10 of 1984), Article 2 (1) (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 while recording the finding of facts. On the contentious question of the rule of inheritance, legal errors related to the admission and evaluation of evidence were committed, the evidence of the defendants was subjected to non-interference and theft, and the plaintiff's witnesses unaware of the material facts. Who did the widow receive the property from, and what was the nature of it? The defendants, on the other hand, presented very authentic and credible evidence of a witness who was a resident of the same village where the parties were concerned. This witness has told about the discrimination of the parties and the customs under which the widow had inherited limited property, such witnesses had their knowledge of the facts related to the person produced on record. Or no question was raised regarding the certificate of credibility, which also shows that the woman is the owner of the property as the widow as a female fact that the widow had mortgaged the property and was released after the partition. She will not fight against the widow as a limited estate holder holding arms while all the widows in full court The decisions of the courts were set aside by the court and the plaintiffs. Dismissed that the widow was deemed to own immovable property and was directed to settle the property. immigration advocates contact from Larkana lawyer