Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

TOTA KHAN versus SECRETARY, FOREST DEPARTMENT


Section 2 (h) of Pakistan Act, 1872 (Pakistan) 1973, Article 185 contracted to cut and export a certain number of trees against the stated value of contract to cut and export more than certain trees in the agreement. And was thus liable to pay the extra tree Defendants contend that the defendant has no right to recover the specified amount due to the \ Extension Fee of because any request was made when an extension was allowed. Had it not been, he would not have been able to stand trial for this matter, either it had not been raised on any trial or grounds. The High Court's decision on whether the claimant was responsible for paying the extra cost was upheld.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.