JAMILA versus MUHAMMAD TAHIR
The appearance and absence of the CPC of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in the decision of the application under O IX, R 6, Sections 12 (2) and 47 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Section 12 2) Establishment of delayed execution proceedings (2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Two mutual mutations in connection with the sale of the house in legitimate questions were earlier challenged by the petitioner and former party decree in his favor. Subsequently, the transfer case was filed in favor of the transfer party. The subsequent transfer was set aside by the appellate court to halt the proceedings, terming the previous order a fraud and on the basis of fraud, but the legality of the High Court It was retained by a previous status order. Was discovered, challenged before the trial court on the basis of fraud and delinquency, and as the matter was in all cases, the trial court had exercised its discretion in maintaining the status quo; Without any reasons it was made baseless while the High Court correctly restored the trial court's order. The High Court's decision found no legal error whereby it restated the order of the case, as the trial court denied leave to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer