COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus SOORAJMULL NAGARMULL
Delay in filing returns does not have to prove the museum rate, but after 43 months of tremendous delay, the Tribunal canceled the fine on account of a dispute between the litigation partners, seizing the department's account books. It will investigate the incomplete return submission. There is no reason for such a significant delay in the return of the dispute between the partners. The tribunal did not present any material to prove that there was a genuine dispute between the partners. The tribunal did not consider the assumptions. But moving forward, the department had to prove Mans Ri. Prior to the imposition of any penalty, any material to show that the assessee was not barred from filing the return for a reasonable reason was subject to the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, section 271 (1) (a).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
