Find a Lawyer

HIDAYAT HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P

R11 (A) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Appellate and Competent Respondent's Seniority Inter-CEO was promoted as Executive Engineer on 17I 1973, while Respondent was appointed as Executive Engineer's cadre. Moved to Exchange. 7 1973 was regularized by an order dated 1 12 1976, which came into force from 7 7 1973. By another softening, on 10 2 1980, defendant's services as an executive engineer were regularized from 10 7 1973 and he was ordered to remain at the bottom of the regular and executive executive engineers. They were displayed on the temporary sanitary list on the date of their appointment. Despite being a junior in the grade of the Superintendent Engineers for the respondents, although both were promoted in the same grade / post on the same date, 26 2 1981, the service tribunal was dismissed on the grounds that on both occasions. But when the civil order was ordered to be harmful, the rights of the servants were granted on 1 12 1976 and 10 2 1980, they did not protest against the orders, thus appealing against the seniority of the defendants. In addition to the ban, the rule of estoppel validity was also imposed on the assumption that the order of the questions (thereby giving the defendant an e. The service was incorporated as a Gazette Engineer and its services were regularized by a specific date (ie, as an Executive Engineer before the date of public employee's promotion), although the Government employee did not have access to them. Represented them against being offended, but still had their case before the service tribunal and jobs for advocates from Thul lawyer