SIRAJUL HAQ versus K.D.A
A. XLI, R 19 and Section 115 Re-Appeal for the default appellate court denied. The reasons for non-payment of costs were disclosed in the appeal restoration application, but the reasons given for the appeal in the appeal for delay in compliance were not stated. No counter affidavit was filed against the position of facts, nor was there any proposal to submit an affidavit in which the amendment was accepted against the restoration of the appeal and the revision permit was denied. The issue of rehabilitation was set aside and a trial remand was obtained for a regular hearing, however, an order for restitution of the appeal was issued on payment of specific costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Sihala lawyer
