DEEDAR ALI versus THE STATE
The review of Section 13 Eowen Martyrs (10 of 1984), Evidence 3, was not considered satisfactory due to the arrest of the suspect by the police and detained by his army, which was also examined in two other related cases. Was gone Until the recovery of illegal arms from the possession of others in the same transaction was not believed and he was convicted of perjury and thus not a competent witness, but the trial court did not consider the provisions of Art. Without complying, 1984 accepted their evidence in this case, which was incontrovertible evidence. The accused was acquitted in circumstances [evidence].
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer
