GHULAM FATIMA versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB LAHORE
Section 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The proprietary rights granted as a tenant were terminated because some irregularities in its allotment were neither served by the original allotted persons. Nor was it heard before the order of cancellation was granted, thus, neither was it heard nor condemned to provide a reasonable opportunity for defense to protect their rights in which the cancellation of the allotment The order violates the rules of natural justice that no person should be condemned with an unreasonable order; this score could have been killed alone because the board The off-revenue was wrong. The original allottee should be instructed to have a fair hearing on what is legally permissible in respect of their rights, before touching on the right of the original allotment to the allotment of the state's land and owning it. The final ruling on the right to be passed [natural justice, principle]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
