Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus SULTAN

Order XXVI, R1 of the Supreme Court Rules XXVI, R 1 Review the decision of the Supreme Court on the ground that the respondents did not, on the basis of any facts in the High Court, could not examine the grounds and There is a commendable explanation. Notice of contradiction was made and appeared in the evidence and there could be no basis for rejecting the applicant's claim which was not argued in the High Court in the affirmative ground which was in fact the appeal memorandum. I was taken in which the fact that the applicants did not refuse. There was no clear mention that such a court was abandoned. The High Court had stated that no further arguments were presented in the court, which, it is the Constitutional duty to do full justice, as per the advice of the applicants, no such restraint could be prevented. The Supreme Court could not examine it in the High Court.) The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is to attend to all aspects and to adopt a holistic view of the issue of justice and to examine the evidence and contradictions presented in it. Was fully noted and the applicants had no answer as to what was the basis of the decision in the evaluation of the evidence. No case was taken to review the decision. The revision application was dismissed in the petition. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Manoabad lawyer