Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 199 The consolidation of the default courts in payment of rent is indicating that the tenant had made a default agreement in payment of rent in the request of the tenant that He was renting the new landlord's rent, not proven on record The default question recorded by the two courts was the result of the authorized jurisdiction reading the wrong evidence or not reading any evidence. Regarding the dispute as to whether the tenant was a contributor to the payment of rent, however, this is a question that the forums have decided Nany ruled by the competent forums. On the question of fact made by a competent tribunal, the same decision can only be challenged in the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court on the grounds that it is neither evidence nor misleading or shocking to read the evidence. Yes, conscience, otherwise, the definition of evidence was not the work of the High Court while no case was made to warrant intervention in dealing with this case in extraordinary jurisdiction. The conclusions of the facts of the courts below were maintained under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
