Find a Lawyer

ALI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Under sections 218, 477A, 420 and 409/109 of the Corruption Act, 1947 (11 of 1947), the conviction of the accused under section 5409 of the evidence was illegal because there was no charge under it. Was planted. Nor was there any evidence of reliance and breach of record, nor was the trial court questioning them regarding their statements under Section 342, CR PC, and breach of trust: technical officer. , Anti-corruption visited the site in the absence of the suspect without any prior notice for site inspection and found that there was work on some material that was being paid to the contractor (s). The bills were not pre-paid bills and were not cross-billed. The set lawyer checked whether he had completed the work or left it incomplete, therefore, the request made by the accused may not be valid, there can be no FIR, no bill, inspection. The report and the counsel were presented in this case and witnesses presented another case in which the accused was acquitted on suspicion of circumstance in the case of being illegal. registration advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer