Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMED versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MULTAN CIRCLE, WAPDA, MULTAN

R54 54 Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R 4 Government employee Punishment for misdemeanor and three years increase without effect No government employee was punished for criminal action against public servant Was launched which proved to be the result of their victory over the benefit. Undoubtedly, the civil servant claims full data for the suspension period, which was dismissed by the department Civil servant, despite being acquitted of the criminal court over the benefit of the doubt, provided the basic principles. Will not be entitled to full molecules during the suspension period. , R54, can only be attracted if he is also exempted from the charges leveled against him under disciplinary rules; for the entire salary to be exempt, he must be acquitted in a criminal case. But also in the action taken by civil servants. And discipline) Rules, 1973 tax advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer