Section 15 required a homeowner's personal request that he was suffering from heart disease and that he had difficulty climbing the stairs because of his recent heart surgery, and that the second building on his property Staying on the floor was a pain for her. Therefore, his son needed the underground location, which was on Landorlord, although he did not inspect the doctor whose patient he was living with, though he did provide proof of the relevant documents. , Which prompted her to resign. The cardiac patient and his tenant did not ask any questions regarding the landlord's illness or the treatment they were receiving; the landlord had no obligation to ask for medical evidence; in the absence of such a challenge, the landlord The claim that his illness, the documentary material he helped with, was unacceptable. Such evidence was sufficient to prove the landlord's health and the treatment of the landlord was not obliged to consult him in the morning for the primary practitioner. The impression is that he should not climb the stairs. In a particular state of health, the necessary advice was naturally available, the absence of medical advice, in itself, would not be destructive to the basis of personal need, provided the other material for his advice was on the record. The landlord's occupation of the ground floor would be more beneficial and healthier, otherwise it would appear that the landlord did not have to prove his ability to climb the stairs. Its failure will be more appropriate for health, if it is allowed to occupy the ground floor in a tenant's possession.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
