Find a Lawyer

AGRIAUTO PROGRESSIVE LABOUR UNION (C.B.A.), KARACHI versus CHAIRMAN, LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BALOCHISTAN AT QUETTA

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 50 Balochistan Employees Special Allowance Act (V 1992), Sections 3, 4 and 6 Settlement and Interpretation of Awards Special Owners Receipt Settlement ment was found between employees and employees pay If there is any increase in salary. Or, after the implementation of this settlement, allowances will be given to the public servants, such increase will be fixed and if any, the employees will be paid, after the settlement between the parties, the provincial government has given special services to the employees. 200 per month as allowance is allowed. Wage up to Rs. 2500, after the provision of special allowance under the Balochistan Employees Special Allowance Act 1992 and the settlement between the parties, the Employees' Union has set out Section 50 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 to translate the settlement between the parties. The petition was terminated, after which the application by the UN was dismissed by the Tribunal, ions were rightly rejected in view of the fact that the Tribunal interpreted such settlement. Or if there is any disturbance or doubt arising between the parties in which the settlement Or award, but not a settlement that has already lost his life Employees' claim In fact, the union was concerned with the enforcement of the rights granted under the Balochistan Employees Special Allowance Act 1992, which could claim that the Tribunal Such guarantees may be enforced by the provisions of Section 6 of the Employees Union, the Balochistan Employees Special Allowance Act. 1992, which provided machinery to collect special allowances for employees famous high court advocate from Machh lawyer