Find a Lawyer

KANIZ FATIMA versus GHULAM MUSTAFA

CPC Adjustments Civil Procedure Code Order XVII O XVII, R 3 The plaintiff set the first date for adjournment for the plaintiff's evidence, causing his lawyer to participate in local council elections and so on The trial court was refusing to be available. In order to comply with the High Court's directive to settle the case within the stipulated time, the defendants engaged another lawyer who requested that the case be resigned but was not postponed. Could not inspect hits. Apart from the High Court, legal provisions, legal principles and justice orders cannot be lost but the court is well within its rights that it faces further delays, which can be very short-lived. But the defendant should have provided another opportunity for cross-examination of evidence when she was unable to examine the plaintiff's testimony or to include her evidence on a particular date, meaning that a prior date was set for the defendant. The effect of deferring Ali was that the plaintiff's testimony remained intact without cross-examination, which is a party's most important right, unless the court came to a clear conclusion that the default prejudice was contradiction or misconduct. Consequently, it should not be deprived of such a valuable right, that the defendant was entitled to at least one more opportunity, OXVII, R 3 with the imposition of provisions. The bill, the civil procedure code against his court, was pressed into service, thus, material irregularities were committed in affirming a very stringent order; after the proper decision of the cases, the cases were re-adjudicated. Trial court for immigration advocates email from Chowk Munda lawyer