Find a Lawyer

AMIR SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

R 5 Disciplinary Inquiry The authorized officer has the discretion to hold a regular inquiry directly or clearly identify the procedure to be followed for disciplinary proceedings regarding the order of the authorized officer. The accused officer should have clear information regarding the relevant supply of rules. It was proposed to take action against him so that he could defend himself according to the default procedure, a public servant, presented with a charge sheet and statement of charges, while later on a show cause notice. The competent officer presented with shall not adopt two courses simultaneously as provided under sub-rules (2) and (3) of R5, Government Servant (Affiliation and Discipline) Rules of the Northwest Frontier Province 1973, and Nor will he be able to change it after adopting a course. The procedure for another authorized officer, whether or not he had the authority to direct a regular inquiry, was nonetheless not absolute and was to be used judiciously on the principles of good cause where against a civil servant. The allegations were that a heavy dismissal or dismissal should be punished, then Justice demanded that the department inquiry must have taken place as the action against the public servant was not taken. Default procedure, order of major fines was not legal and durable Authorities were instructed to reinstate government employees. patent advocate from Narang Mandi lawyer