Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH versus M:B.R.

In the Stabilization Controversy in Articles 10 and 13 of the West Pakistan Stabilization Holding Ordinance 1960, respondents were given the respondents in the process of consolidation that the applicant occupied the land and made some construction on which the application was made. The petitioner's appeal was dismissed. The unifying authorities through the ban had unanimously said that the defendants were occupying the land in the dispute and had a better claim that the report submitted by the Consolidation Officer in compliance with the High Court order also applied for the applicant's case. Has not been forwarded as claimed to have no construction work. Was present by the applicant and the land was not shown in the possession of any person in which the applicant failed to prove his appeal against the stability scheme otherwise the time restriction was imposed. inheritance advocates near Chak Sheza lawyer