Find a Lawyer

FAZAL RAHIM versus AI-WAJID TOWN

Civil Procedure Code Order VII of the CPC Plaintiff VII, R 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), cases 42 and 54 for the declaration and permanent injunction of the plaintiff who leased them by the defendant. Was sued for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant in connection with the plots allotted to him, and before filing the defendant's written statement, They were obliged to enforce a proper lease in their favor. To reject the claimant's claim that the lease agreement was obligated to pay the rates, taxes, development charges for banning the plaintiff / lease and the relevant authority also had to grant the defendant allotment / lease to the plaintiffs in such The development charges were approved. Copies of the lease agreement and certificates were not issued by the relevant authority in favor of the defendant, while on the basis of the documents relied upon by the defendant defendant, the tooth was thus transferred Depending on the documents of, the plaintiff's case was dismissed The plaintiff claimed that the court could only review the actions taken by the plaintiff for the purpose of dismissing the plaintiff. And it cannot be relied upon by any foreign material and court order because of the fact that the documents were not filed with the plaintiff depending on the defendants, but in that case such documents should not be relied upon. : On the basis of stolen documentary documents which resulted in the plate being rejected as the primary document online advocate from Pindi bhohri lawyer