GHULAM FARID versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS
CPC Temporary Mergers and Interlocutory Orders A XXXXX Civil Procedure Code Order XXXX Distribution, one of the legal heirs, filed a specific contractual performance on the basis of an alleged sale agreement between himself and another legal heir. Did the person refuse to execute an agreement that alleged it was fraudulent, as well as a claim for specific performance? The evidence on the record that prevented the applicants from interfering with the possession of the property for interim injunction has proved on the record that the property in dispute is a vacant plot which was in the possession of the respondents who at their own risk. It was intended to build on it. The court rejected the injunction by conducting an alleged sale agreement, leasing was based on the principles of pendenza and the application did not disclose the existence of a primary fee case, balance of facility and irreparable injury. Under which the court was to find that there was no first case in favor of the applicants based on the objective scrutiny of the petitioners. The parties and the matter are on record, there was no misunderstanding or discretion and in such a situation it was unthinkable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Rangoo lawyer