MOMAN versus CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER
Martial Law Regulation 1959 No. 64 Para 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Resumed by the Allotment Authority of the Land Re-petitioner claimed that the claim of the sitting claimant was accepted. , But they were not contracted to sell the disputed land. The change of land in the dispute which was approved in favor of the petitioner was not challenged by the respondents and the Chief Land Commissioner without going into various aspects of the matter whether the applicant disputed the sale price of the land. Is responsible for non-payment of land, that the land should not be sold and the land resumed. The non-payment of recorded sale price without the various aspects of the Chief Land Commissioner's search case was declared illegal by the High Court in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. If there was no error by the parties, the decision was made to remand the decision after giving the relevant parties a hearing. In case of payment of sale price by the applicant, it has been found that the land has Should have been in his favor otherwise the authority would have the freedom to approve the proper decree.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Khanqah Dogran lawyer