Find a Lawyer

MRS. M.J. HEMANI versus ABID ALI

Section 2 (a) (e) (h), & & ? cases of retaining application for eviction of premises consisted of saw mill and not so, but it was not the case of landlord that later found The land was rented from the underground, but the landlord himself had confessed that when the house was given to the tenant, a saw mill had already been set up which had a section mill or section. The building described by the two hundred mill did not fall within the scope of the building which could neither be considered as land nor any building. The Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance was excluded from the scope of 1979 and the rent controller had no jurisdiction to hear the case. property advocate from Ubaro lawyer