MUHAMMAD DIN versus NAZIR AHMED
Limitation Act 1908 Art: 144 Claims for the protection of encroachments on occupied land include the property in question, which the claimant recorded in the state auction, and the matter of measuring the boundary of the premises, in this case of minor encroachments, when the encroachments Or, to the extent of fact, self-impediments could not give rise to negative occupation by being unreasonable, it needed to be public, hostile, and intentional in order to establish a negative occupation. The action was taken and otherwise, the issue of defamation usually does not arise. Negative possession is not restricted to that extent, so, even if the defendants had crossed the land on the premises, this fact was neither committed nor known to the public, thus, No question of adverse possession can arise [anti-ownership]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Parachinar lawyer