Section 15 (2) (iii) of the subletting proof landlord alleged that the tenant was then included in the premises which made himself the sole owner of the business and continued to do so, but later The tenant converted the business into a partner company and it was covered by the tenant without the written consent of the landlord in favor of the partner firm. It was not the case of the tenant that from the beginning of the tenancy it had remained in possession of the houses. The tenant alleged that he was a partner of the firm's tenant, stating that from the date of registration to its dissolution, the firm was in possession of all of Factor's partners to control the covered rent during that period. Was in the possession of all the partners, therefore, it was rightly concluded that the subletting had been proven.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
