QADRI HAJVERI GOODS FORWARDING AGENCY (REGD.), LAHORE versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION-FBR, SUKKER
Sections 168 (1), (2), 177, 180 and 194 Appeal for Transfer of Goods / Goods from a Carrier to a Carrier Release This order was originally challenged on the basis of allegations of appellant / carrier smuggling. Before the appellate tribunal carrier raised the objection to Lucas Standie because he was not the owner of the detained goods, being an accuracy transporter, the carrier was in charge of the goods and was receiving it. Delivery of goods to the receiver (security orders) as Oman's status as a commodity yielded serious consequences for the delivery of goods to a secure and stable state because when a freight transfer carrier is assigned to the destination port If given, the carrier's duty was to make sure that the shipment reached the designated port if the shipment did not reach its destination or even if it did not reach the destination but the carrier or its agent. Because of negligence. If the same was lost or misplaced and the goods were not delivered to the person who confirmed the actual goods or bill leading, then the carrier was responsible for the delivery of the ship's goods, the luggage or the luggage guarantee. Carrier may not be relieved of its responsibilities by transferring its responsibility to port authorities to the carrier or shipbuilder or to fulfill the bill claiming carrier's compensation, as well as claims for lost goods and carrier damages. Is right Compensating them for the cost of the goods, such as claims for damages that they retained because of the absence of the appellant / carrier, in which case, your
Related judgments — Customs Appellate Tribunal Lahore, 2014
