JEHANA versus TAJA
Section 10 (3) of the West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (X67I of 1967), section 164, revised the Rehabilitation Stability Scheme by the Consolidation Officer, and filed an appeal before the Collector through the plaintiff. It was rejected due to its limitations. Since it was filed with delay of more than one year and rejected the 7 day order, the appeal was rejected by the Commissioner who reviewed the same seed order. The applicant had failed to prove that the stability scheme was confirmed by the respondent's consent or possession. The land was given to him in the dispute, so the respondents' voluntary consent to the scheme's verification was very doubtful as the possession of the disputed valuable land was not changed to the Commissioner while accepting the review against the Collector's order. There were compelling reasons to conclude that there was no appeal number filed by the collector against the Accreditation Scheme.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Tharo Shah lawyer
