O XXXIX, R 2 (3) Notice of contempt of court for breach of stagnation order ordering the High Court to maintain the classification, preventing the construction of the scheme in violation of the Central Application Approval Plan Trying. , The court has appointed a local commissioner whose separate reports indicate that the respondent has violated the status quo order passed by the respondents of the court, adding further orders to his status. Was prohibited from moving, and by moving, leasing or leasing any part of the building in response to the question, the prohibition extended the building. Despite the final order, on the contrary, and it accepted one of the respondents' shops for a moderate order violation, it was instructed to take action under the provisions of O XXXX, R 2. Go? ()), Contempt proceedings should not be taken against the CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
