SARDAR MUHAMMAD BASHIR PEHLAWAN versus RAJA NASIR AHMED KHAN
Sections 72 and 49 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, Rr 8 and 9 electoral plea, could not be brought before the court because of the reason for the default exclusion restoration. ? And the Kashmir Legislative Assembly (Election) Ordinance, 1970 was a special law; Section 72 of the Ordinance gave the Election Tribunal the power to exclude the election petition as the applicant was not present, but such order in the Ordinance No revocation clause was set. The election request was made for proof but neither the applicant nor his lawyer was required to present a proper reason for appearing before the Election Tribunal as the applicant's lawyer was not present. The restoration of the election petition was made deliberately and deliberately for the petitioner, which was not considered by the petitioner for the reappointment of the DPTI as the petitioner's counsel for his petition. The Election Tribunal was unable to present the proper reasons why the dismissal election petition could be restored in the case of the petitioner's submission. Election petition has been dismissed in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
