MAQSOOD-UR-REHMAN versus JANAY
Article 144 Profitable Asset Record shows that the defendants, on the 29th of November 19 11 1968, have enjoyed continuous enjoyment of the property, claiming continual, irrevocable, possession of the property without any claim to it. Against them) on 16 to 6 1982, when the defendants first took notice that the applicant claimed ownership of the applicant on the same land even if it was assumed that he was dated 1798 1968. The suit has become the owner of the land, then after the occupation of the respondents on the land from 1796 1968 the question will be negative and that is because of the petitioner's establishment till 179 1980. The case was set up on 16 16 1982 and thus it will be outside the period of twelve years and thus will be rejected within the meaning of Article 144, Limitation Act, 1908.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Miran Shah lawyer