Find a Lawyer

AYUB versus THE STATE

Sections 325/34 and 342 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 555 Extending the Penalty of Extension to a Prison The defendant filed an appeal against his conviction and sentence by the magistrate while the complainant increased his sentence. A review application was also set up. The Sessions Court, after discussing the evidence, dismissed the accused's appeal through a verdict and increased his sentence while accepting the review request, and the same witness was found to be inadequate, because in the presence of any decision in the review petition. There were penalties for the absence of judgment. Under the law and procedure, all parts of justice were controlled to meet. The merit of the case also did not approve the petition under Article 1 56 under A. The CRPC was accepted accordingly. property advocate from Burewala lawyer