Find a Lawyer

BATOOL BEGUM versus DILDAR HUSSAIN ANSARI

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) In his affidavit, Landlord's personally in dire need stated that he needed a home in dispute for the personal use and use of one of his sons. With his son living in a rented house, and because the residence was neither adequate nor suitable for him at this time, Landlady also said that he had it. He has no home, except that the house was cross-examined at length for landlady under dispute but could not do so. It should be pointed out that in this area or any other place he owns another landlord, and to prove that Burden was a tenant, he was a landlord other than a disputed house, But he failed to do so in the case of the tenant finding that the personal need for the property was not proven to be a dispute site, they were allegedly based and highlighted the fact of the matter. That is, not a single landlord's son refrains from owning a homeowner. Involvement of a tenant with his personal property which he wishes for his own personal use tax advocates from Ghuzdar lawyer