Find a Lawyer

ARIF ALI versus GULSHAN CARPET INDUSTRIES LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulation and Function) Regulations, 1973, Regular 32 Disciplinary Action Some employees were subjected to disciplinary proceedings and The showcase notice was issued by them. Employers accused of inciting night shift workers to go on strike while others were taking action against assembling at the factory gate and stopping work, a disciplinary action that employees accused of domestic misconduct. Was launched against. The initiation of disciplinary proceedings was a routine matter of industrial and commercial entities and would not cause any unlawful labor practice under section 15 of the Ordinance; in illicit affairs the employer was obliged to pay the loss. I should start the process because discipline was the only responsibility. Even if there was something illegal or the irregularities in the charge sheet, the showcase notice or the employer's declaration letter issued by the employer, it cannot attract the provisions of section 15 of the Ordinance, 1969 ? It was the employer's right to investigate against its employees, which could not be stopped or simply stripped. Because the employee who issued the charge sheet as a union official was found guilty of corruption, it was the employer's prejudice and the commission was not given any authority to continue disciplinary action against the worker, Why not be an employee of the same? The union cannot seek asylum under the activities of a trade union if an action is taken against an unwilling worker because of corruption. criminal advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer