ARSHAD MAHMOOD versus FACTORY MANAGER, GULSHAN CARPET INDUSTRIES LIMITED, LAHORE
Sections 15 (a) (d) and 22a (8) (g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Function) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) challenges the transfer of the employee to the Clerk as a Clerk. His transfer was challenged at the head office, stating that he had been subjected to abuses due to his trade union activities in the capacity of the president of labor employee The employee's union is a transfer agent and It was always ordered in the best interest. Establishment management has the inherent right to transfer its employees to facilitate the running of their business and it cannot be challenged that every employee posting from one place to another in the same establishment has the right and he / she is non-existent. Will not establish a fair process. The employer's administration had the right to move the job from one station to another and could not be treated as a punishment because the management had the right to require the services and establishment of the services of its employees. Use as per requirements. The exchange of any member union did not include a violation of section 15 (a) (d) of the Ordinance, which dealt with unfair labor issues in the employer's law section. Do not grant unrestricted licenses to office hearers / union members that cannot be exchanged by the administration at any time and at any place in the interest of management may be ordered and avoided in the name of union activities. If an employee is unhappy with their exchange, they can go to the appropriate forum to resolve it and not the Ordinance, 1969.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Theing Jattan More lawyer