UNITED BANK LIMITED versus ABDUL RAZZAK & CO.
The Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 section 15 (2) (vii) required the landlord to prove that he needed a home in dispute of good faith for his personal use, but offered by The evidence needed to prove his personal incompetence, apart from being extremely unsatisfactory and irrelevant, was vague and out of sketch. In order to conclude that the landlord was in good faith with the landlord, the court must be satisfied with the fact of the landlord's claim, seeing that the landlord was not under excuse. As per the personal requirement, the tenants attacked the right to own the land, while the tenant controller made the right decision on which the landlord failed to put the burden on them while proving their contractual / legal obligations. The landlord has failed to prove that he needs the premises in good faith. Personal use of it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Ghari Dupatta lawyer
