Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI versus THE STATE

The accused's involvement in the robbery on the date, time and place alleged by the prosecution of the appreciation of the provisions of Sections 17 and 20 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 392/34 and 341 and subsequently in a substantial part thereof Occupied. The four men in the van, along with their driver, were actually or constructively in possession of the money that the criminals had snatched from them, in fact identifying the firearms and putting them in fear of death. He was, and was, therefore, not an independent witness to be subjected to crime and none of them were to be discharged as witnesses, as well as being a witness to the crime, fulfilling the requirements of al-Tazhid al-Shudh. No other honorable purse was appointed or the trial court upheld the testimony of eyewitnesses by at all, as well as the requirements of Tazkiyah al-Shudh, which is an example of this crime. The defendant's sentence was not complied with for the commission of `Harabah 'found guilty under section 17 of the Ordinance and accordingly the conviction of the accused under Section 17 of the Ordinance was dropped and instead the section 392 Was sentenced under section 20 of the ordinance read with. , PPC and sentenced to ten years in prison. The RI, with penalties and penalties under Section 1341, PPC, was, however, denied a major exemption from the minor offense. female advocates from Bhera lawyer