Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD ALI KHAN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) / 34 Guarantee, Approval of the use of hatchet in this case was a suspected complaint, according to the FIR statement, fact I was complaining about it. The accused, an Army employee, who came to his village on medical leave, could not afford to risk his career without a good explanation for the incident and without any serious cause for complaint. Section 7, Cr, CCP clause and its case is similar to that of its co-accused, who has already been released on bail, cannot be treated as a bail-out, especially for bail. When the recovery of the weapons of crime took effect. And the investigation concluded that the hatchet was allegedly presented to the police before the blood was shed and thus was not necessarily linked to the commission of the crime, the accused was admitted. ? Guaranteed in the circumstances registration advocate from Ghizer lawyer