Find a Lawyer

RAFIA BEGUM versus ABDUL AZIZ

West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Transfer Act (IV of 1882), Section 573 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction denied the relationship of landlord and tenant applicants (tenant) Verbally agree to sell the property in question for a certain amount of money and after receiving a residual amount of 4s of that amount, there was no locus standi to withdraw it and applicant transferred Section 53A, Was entitled to the benefits of the Property Property Act, 1882, below which the oral sale was not accepted by the courts for good reasons, After proper appreciation of the evidence on the two court's search records below on the plea of such realism, the constitutional jurisdiction was not open to interference even if the sale agreement was approved, as well as verbal. Being a contract will not be of any benefit to the applicant as it is a condition such as the application of section 33A, the application before the transfer of property, in the Act of 1882, should be the contract on which the petitioner signed the transfer. Partial performance was also not occupied by the premises but they were under tenant status even before the contract was signed. The occupation was, the required agreement was not made between the parties. An action had to be taken in connection with the forwarding of the sale agreement which resulted in the applicant's reliance on 5AA, the Transfer Property Act, 1882. Therefore, the landlord And the tenant was completely misunderstood, therefore, there was a complete misunderstanding between the parties. The rent was not paid after the sale agreement. Was considered list of supreme court advocates from Sahiwal lawyer