Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALIM versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

0XVII, R 3 The closing case of the evidence, which was set for recording the evidence, was postponed three times for the preparation of the evidence, but the plaintiff could not present the evidence and after the plaintiff's evidence was closed, the court The case was decided against them, the defendants showed sufficient cause. The trial was postponed, but such reason was not taken into account by the courts in any way; the defendants were also liable for the delay, if any, in the case of the defendant. Alias took a long time to file his written statement, although he was given three dates to present evidence, he needed to give them another date to give them evidence so that they could present evidence, but for unknown reasons. Was not done by the courts, the trial was not only fair and fair on the third date in the trial court. Oh. In this case, the plaintiff was entitled to postpone the trial, so that his evidence could be presented at a later date. On the technical point, the law would not be allowed to be defeated because the courts had to avoid the skill in deciding disputes between the parties in their best interests, setting aside orders to close the evidence of the defendants and decide the case against them. Went to the court and demanded a re-decision after giving a case. Opportunity to present evidence to parties power of attorney advocate Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer