MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG
Civil Procedure Code Order Twelfth of CPC Production, Outbound of Documents and Returns OXIII, R2 Title Suite Additional Proof The plaintiff's production closed his evidence in the affidavit and although he did not present a registered sales deed in the evidence 40 years old documentary proof. His title to the property in question, but at the conclusion of his evidence, he stated that I would present the evidence in denial with the documents of which the plaintiff, who had reserved his right to commit the original sale, Also confirmed and confirmed the same. Wass also referred to the application for the preparation of such registered sale deed in the list of dependents because additional evidence was presented on the day when the defendants had yet to begin a trial, therefore, where the title was fit. The most relevant documentary evidence of this kind should have been allowed. The submission of additional evidence and the delay in disposal of the suit should not be merely a possibility on the basis of the plaintiff's refusal to request additional evidence by title.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
