MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus STATE
Appreciation of the Sections 302/149, 307/149 and 148 evidence, both sides found, based on the eyewitness account, medical evidence and the motive portion of the story, that the day of the incident was determined to determine the score. ? As a result, both sides were injured. If the accused party consisted of seven armed men, the complaining party would not have been able to hurt the three accused. It is likely that the net about the accused was thrown too high. Can't be Under the precautionary sentence of only three injured persons during the incident, conditions were maintained under Sections 302/34 and 307/34, PPC, while the other four accused were acquitted on the benefit of doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Garh Maharaja lawyer
