Find a Lawyer

FAZAL ABBAS versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION

Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Act 1956 Section 10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Removal of employees from employment under section 10 (2) of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Act 1956 was a valid employee employed ? Assistant at the time when the cartoon containing narcotics was placed in a fresh fruit container that was loaded into the flight as a cargo assistant for an overseas employee, in the container loading prior to asserting section 10 (2). This act was not necessary, however, as employees heard in support of their defense authority not only acted against that employee but with other staff who were on duty at the airport authority at the relevant time and date. There is no need to prove individual action. Instead of being questioned by each of the employees authority and dismissing the employee on the basis of mismanagement, section 10 (2) of the act that was permissible was not brought on record so that To show that an action against an employee is offensive, where no action was taken in public, the court will not consider it technically illegal. Observe the situation and the fact that the UN community was treated as a leading supplier of drugs to Pakistan, there was an unprovoked action in the public interest and in the interests of the country. Could not be declared technically illegal, even though the concession did not include any specific question about the law of public importance under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution. when you need a advocate from Laliah lawyer