Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL MUNIF versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

In the resignation of an elected member of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 64, 127 and 199 Provincial Assembly, it was claimed that he did not resign from his sitting petitioner who declared the letter of resignation as mere, fake and framed. He alleged that the blank signed papers, which his party received from his members, were filled unofficially and he was resigned by the Deputy Speaker of the Provincial Assembly applicant stating that It was reported that after the Army Operation Cleanup applicant remained underground, other party members came out and came to the scene. On the first available occasion, at the press conference announcing that he had not resigned from the Assembly resignation letter on any occasion, on the basis of which the Deputy Speaker Assembly notification of resignation of 28 11 1992 dated 27 6 1992. Was issued and if the applicant had not resigned from his seat, the notification was issued by the Deputy Speaker 5 months after his letter of resignation, the applicant being a free man and now in hiding. Could have easily written a letter or met the deputy speaker or informed him that he had not resigned and Should not resign. Impact of this, but the applicant did not do so and instead filed a constitutional application one month after the deputy speaker issued the notification, failing to resign, to deny the fact of his resignation earlier. Without contacting him, he could not challenge his resignation on any basis. top advocates from Barbar Loi lawyer