MA. HASNAIN versus AZHAR MAHMOOD
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 8 and 15, during the determination of the occupied tenant while fixing the premises at the request of the landlord, rent, construction, rent paid by other tenants of the same premises. And all material facts such as the increase and the increase in repair charges were taken into consideration. Evidence given by other tenants in the property tax proved that the rent paid by them was higher than the rent paid by the tenant despite the fact that the rent in the tenant's possession was almost the same. Was occupied by other tenants of the same building in which the cost of construction and repair and property tax increase by the tenant in connection with the proof of the increase was also accepted by the tenant The tenant was an old tenant. Being considered a privileged tenant, the law rents older tenants and new ones There was no difference between the tenants under the Ordinance 1979, which had to be extended to those who fulfilled their responsibilities as tenants and paid a significant liability within the stipulated time, which the landlord owned. The rent controller should not be paid in the same manner as the charity, the exact fixed rent of the premises, keeping in mind all the relevant facts and facts contained on the record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jaffarabad lawyer