MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus ADIBA MUSHARRAF
Section 13 (3) (u) Personal Needs of the Landlord The landlord who was doing business in a shop that did not belong to him, wanted to make a purchase in the dispute that the landlord had purchased for his own use. The shop in dispute was not suitable for the needs of the landlords because the upper part of the shop in question was already in the possession of the landlord so it was not enough that their need was not empty. The place, although not enough ground to approve the tenant's eviction order, when the landlords successfully proved that they really needed the premises for a change in their business that was currently running in the premises Was related to another body. The need for landlords cannot be said simply for the landlords. Deciding Premises for Houses Deciding on premises of landlords as far as the landlord's needs may be met. The NT cannot order landlords to operate their businesses upside down and do not have to ask questions for their business, which they recently purchased for business purposes where the landlord's personal needs A withdrawal request was filed based on the statement. Unless there is evidence of the casualties of the landlords, their application should not be considered valid.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Tall lawyer