Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BAKHSH versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Section 38 (2) Punjab Municipal Works Rules, 1925, R11 (2) Appellant discharged his duties as Municipal Engineer on his request Appellant claims that he was described as Municipal Engineer in the order of retirement. Gone, so that they can be treated. The supervisor was not valid at the time of his retirement. Appellant was appointed municipal engineer for a term of one year, and he was subsequently held under a restraining order by the appellant's retirement order of the courts. After retiring as a municipal engineer, the only reference was made to the fact that he was serving as municipal engineer at the time of retirement, which is being relied upon by the appellant on his retirement dependence. He was challenged by the filing, but his prayer for a temporary injunction was denied and he decided to withdraw the case, as demonstrated by the fact that the appellant himself was in his This was not the retirement municipal work order property advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer