Find a Lawyer

RANA MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN versus STATE

Section 4 Police Rules, 1934, 8 24 4 The accused, the public officer (police inspector), with the advice and advice of his superiors, seems to have adopted the Police Rules, instead of the 834 4 of the 1934 Rules. A report was filed consciously. In proceeding under section 154, the CCP intended to carry out the High Court's order without damaging its subsidiary, which was undoubtedly not in compliance with the letter and spirit of this order, however, seeking appropriate advice and Because of the error, it seems that a soft spot for his conviction could go without saying in this case that it might hurt him, and hence his intention to disobey the court order or reduce his dignity. Without this, it would not be possible to proceed. Rejected and the advantage arising in this situation was whether he acted deliberately or proceeded in any matter with bad intentions, which was to be given during unconditional treatment. Loved pardon by the accused as a confession of guilt, should also have given him the opportunity to defend himself on the grounds that his act was not deliberately and willfully done before he was convicted. The benefit of the accused was to accept and accept the circumstances. Unconditional amnesty was offered as a matter of his grace and he was acquitted of the charge because he was subjected to considerable torture and suffered mental torture. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Taunsa sharif lawyer