Find a Lawyer

MALIK SHER versus RAB NAWAZ

Under the doctrine of Article 15 Land Reform Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), para 25 premises suit, the plaintiff asserted the preferential right of purchase while the defendants opposed the claim that the claimant was under the plaintiff's claim. The earth is native. That the defendants (vendors) had joined a stranger in the purchase of the land they owned, their claim was to fail under the Sink Factor doctrine that two of the defendants were tenants and not a third, according to the measles decree. Will not be considered. Whether a person was a tenant or had to be established through evidence on record, the plaintiff did not state in the case that the defendant was not a tenant of the land under consideration, nor was he examined on the matter. That the trial court found that the defendants had no preferential right to do so. , Can not be set aside on a ground by a lower appellate court which was never appealed to or upheld by the trial court's decision of the High Court. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Balakot lawyer