Section 11 The main role of the tenant's application, which is in question, was that the building was non-residential and could not be vacated for the purpose of housing for the landlord and, thus, the non-residential core character of the building was residential. And it was listed in it. The municipality's record was a clear indication of the role of the building in two rooms, a kitchen and a bathroom, because I had used a room and an expanse by a previous owner to remove the space by a tenant. It was possible. The original character of the underground building was located in the residential complex. Surrounding it were buildings used for residential purposes. Initially, the building itself was constructed as a residential house. Temporary use of part of the building for non-residential purposes will not negate the original residential character of the building. The question is, is the building a residential building?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
