PIRAN DITTA versus STATE
In assessing the evidence of Clauses 2 30 & II44, Part II, no motive for murder by the accused could be excluded from the evidence which was separated from the accused after giving him a blow, however, from this knowledge It can be safely burdened that a violent head blow may have caused the death of the deceased and since this offense had come under the purview of Section 304, Part II, PPC, the accused under Section 302 , PPC was changed to Section 304, Part II, PPC and accordingly and his life sentence was reduced to ten years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Shorkot lawyer
