Find a Lawyer

VOHRA CORPORATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

25 of the Customs Act 1969 [incorporated by the Finance Ordinance (11 of 1988)] with reference to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 73 (2), 89 and 264 (c) of the Finance of Ordinance (II of 1988), Section 5 Accordingly, the Constitution had the power and ability to touch the Ordinance (Finance Ordinance II of 1988), to the extent of the insertion of Article 25B, Customs Act, 1969, on the Touchstone of Arts 73 (3) and 89. An article (mini-bill) covers Article 73 (2) of the Constitution as provided in Article 89 of the Finance Ordinance of the Constitution (II of 1988), in relation to its Section 5, Section 25B To the extent possible. The Customs Act, 1969, during its proceedings, was a valid piece of Legislation No. 30 (1) / 88 dated 30th 1988 by the Central Board of Revenue in the exercise of powers (Section 25B Customs Act, 1969). ? Section 25B, Customs Act, 1969 and notification 30 1 6 1 are also valid 988 had ceased to be operative at the expiration of four months from the date of the 1988 Finance Ordinance II declaration (26 6 1988), because it Article 89 (2) shall be deemed to be void. a) (i) All rights, liabilities and liabilities acquired by notification or orders issued under section 25B, Customs Act, 1969 and under the Constitution, while the Finance Ordinance, 1988, occupied this field. , Because they will conform to these rights. In the category of past and closed transactions, the use of the powers proposed under Annexure S, 25B, Customs Act, 1969, and notification 30 6 1988, goes further than 26 10 1988, when section 25B falls under the Customs Act. , Was repealed in 1969 after the repeal of the Finance Ordinance 1988, would be illegal in law, except: Conditions covered by Article 264 (c) of the Constitution [Interpretation of the Constitution] Pakistan, top advocate family court from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer