Find a Lawyer

BAKHSH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Civil Procedure Code Order XLI, X 19 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 169 of the Civil Procedure for Original Decisions, Article 169 Keeping the preceding injunction and restoring the appeal for its hearing and decision on eligibility. The defendant was given the wrong address by the defendant. Reportedly served on the wrong service through the press in order to avoid confrontation, and since it was later linked, it was predicted that the evidence on record suggests that the plaintiff filed suit against the plaintiff. The lawsuit was filed in connection with the production of land. ; And the decree was implemented and the money received from the plaintiff was entitled, and he also applied to the relevant authorities for the grant of proprietary rights. The record of the previous party's decree was moved to set aside the defendant was successful in establishing that it was not properly served in the appeal and he had sought information on the same grounds. I applied for separation of the previous party decree and the evidence on the record was sufficient. To remember the previous decision advocates from Bhimbar lawyer